Tuesday, February 14, 2017

26% of Californians Were Covered By Medicaid/CHIP in 2015


Kaiser Family Foundation recently updated state fact sheets on Medicaid spending. Here are some key findings from the report on Medicaid in California:

In FY 2015, Medicaid spending in CA was $85.4 billion.
26% of people in CA were covered by Medicaid/CHIP in 2015.
4 in 5 Medicaid enrollees in CA are in families with a worker.
34% of Medicaid spending in CA is for Medicare beneficiaries.
One-fifth of state general fund spending in CA is for Medicaid.
58% of all federal funds received by CA is for Medicaid.


Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, January2017

Monday, February 13, 2017

1 in 5 Have Received Virtual Health Care


Accenture recently released a survey on consumer interest in telemedicine. Here are some key findings from the report:

78% of consumers surveyed were interested in receiving care virtually.
1 in 5 survey respondents have ever received virtual health care.
77% would like to track indicators like blood pressure with technology.
3 in 4 respondents wanted to use telemedicine for follow-up appointments.
44% would be more likely to try virtual care if their physician recommended it.
When asked why they turn to virtual care, 37% attributed it to convenience.

Source: Accenture, February 9, 2017

Thursday, February 9, 2017

80 Million Adults Went Without Care in 2012 Due To Cost


The Commonwealth Fund recently released an analysis of the health insurance market before and after the ACA. Here are some key findings from the report:

In 2012, 80 million adults went without care or medication because of the cost.
63 million in 2016 went without healthcare or medication because of the cost.
43% buying plans on their own in 2010 said it was difficult or impossible.
1 in 4 adults in 2016 said it was difficult or impossible to find a plan.
In 2012, 29% did not go to a doctor when they were sick because of the cost.  
1 in 5 didn't go to a doctor when they were sick due to cost in 2016.


Source: Commonwealth Fund, February 1, 2017

Tuesday, February 7, 2017

WellCare profit soars on rising Medicaid enrollment


By Shelby Livingston  | February 7, 2017

 

WellCare recorded a giant increase in profit in the fourth quarter of 2016, bolstered by membership growth in its Medicaid business and reduced Medicare Advantage costs.

The Tampa, Fla.-based insurer recorded net income in the quarter ending Dec. 31 of $44.9 million, up 245.4% from the same quarter a year ago. For the full year, profit more than doubled to $242.1 million compared with 2015.

WellCare deals mostly in the Medicaid space and after a few years of stagnant growth, it has been growing its membership rapidly. It recently signed new Medicaid contracts in Nebraska and Georgia, bringing in new members. It also closed acquisitions of Care1st Arizona, and subsidiary of Care 1st Health Plan, and some assets of Advicare, a Medicaid managed-care company in South Carolina. Those two deals brought 117,000 new Medicaid members to WellCare.

WellCare's total Medicaid membership was about 2.5 million at the end of 2016, up 6.5% over 2015.

Meanwhile, Medicare Advantage membership dipped by 9,000 members to 345,000. But Medicaid has recently made a play to grow its footprint in the Advantage market, which has become increasingly attractive to insurers. Because the baby boomer generation is aging into Medicare at rapid pace, privatized Advantage plans have seen tremendous growth. That space is also set to expand further under the new federal administration, which supports pushing more Medicare members toward private plans.

Medicare Advantage currently represents about 27% of WellCare's annual revenue. But WellCare's $800 million deal to acquire Universal American Corp., announced in November, will add to that significantly. The deal will also help boost WellCare's Advantage star ratings, which have been low. About 70% of Universal American's 114,000 Medicare Advantage members are in plans with at least four stars.

Across Medicaid, Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, WellCare has about 3.9 million members. It doesn't sell plans on the Affordable Care Act's exchanges.

Despite higher membership and premium revenue in Medicaid, WellCare's revenue for the fourth quarter was $3.5 billion, virtually flat from the same time last year. For the full year, revenue was $14.2 billion, up 2.5% over 2015.

Wellcare's medical benefits ratio, which shows how much of every collected premium dollar was spent on medical care and quality, was 85.3% in the fourth quarter, compared with 85.9% at the same time last year. For the full year, the MBR was 85.0%, down from 86.3% in 2015.

 

Family Premiums Have Increased 140% Since 2013


eHealth recently released an analysis of premium costs for 2017. Here are some key findings from the report:

The average individual premium in 2017 is $393 per month.
In 2013 the average individual premium was $197 per month.
Between 2013 and 2017, average individual premiums have increased 99%.
The average family premium is $1,021 per month in 2017.
In 2013 the average family's premium was $426 per month.
Family premiums have increased 140% between 2013 and 2017.

Source: eHealth, January 23, 2017

Monday, February 6, 2017

7 threats to supplemental health in the major medical storm


The wind out of Washington blows hard

Feb 06, 2017 | By Allison Bell

The uncertainty surrounding efforts to kill or change the Affordable Care Act should make this a great time to sell supplemental health insurance products in the voluntary benefits market.

Accident insurance, hospital indemnity insurance, cancer insurance, critical illness insurance and other supplemental products are like umbrellas that workers can use to make up for the holes in the employer's major medical coverage.

The holes were growing rapidly before the ACA came along, and they kept growing after the ACA arrived. The average annual deductible for a worker with single coverage increased to $about 1,200 in 2016, according the Menlo Park, California-based Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. That's up from an average of about $500 in 2009, before the ACA took effect, and up from about $300 in 2006.

Typical workers, meanwhile, have no spare cash. Rob Grubka, president of employee benefits at Windsor, Connecticut-based Voya Financial, says 46 percent of Americans would have to borrow money to handle a $400 emergency expense.

Now, the attack on the ACA seems likely to poke new holes in major medical coverage, and ease restrictions on use of supplemental health products to fill the holes.

If, for example, the federal government stops enforcing the ACA employer coverage offer mandate and the individual coverage ownership mandate, some employers may drop their major medical coverage. Some workers may stop taking up the coverage their employers offer.

Republicans in Congress and the executive branch may also roll back Obama administration efforts to restrict sales of supplemental products that could compete with major medical coverage.

Because of those changes, workers could make more use of supplemental health benefits both to make up for growing gaps in major medical coverage, and to compensate for loss of access to major medical coverage.

But, of course, in the insurance industry, every potential opportunity comes with concerns about potential risks. Here's a look at some of the potential risks.

1. Major medical uncertainty

The Affordable Care Act has had a more dramatic effect on the individual market than on the group market, but it's done plenty to change the group market. ACA change efforts could change the group market even more. How group major medical evolves will shape the supplemental products workers need.

Ashley Mehrer, a voluntary products development executive at Chattanooga, Tennessee-based Unum Group, says it's too early for Unum to tell what opportunities might emerge from efforts to change the ACA. 

Jeff Smedsrud, co-founder of Miami-based HealthCare.com Inc., a web-based insurance quote service, says he's assuming Congress will eliminate the ACA mandates but save some kind of subsidy for purchasers of individual health coverage.

Grubka says product designers at Voya are trying to focus on what they knew for certain. "The growing prevalence of high-deductible health plans means more costs are moving to consumers," he says.

Mehrer and other voluntary benefits specialists say the best defense against major medical market uncertainty is a flexible product.

"Having detailed information can certainly help us customize plan designs and price points," Mehrer says.

But she says Unum tries to design products so they'll be valuable even when conditions change. 

2. Major medical deserts

Marilyn Tavenner, the president of America's Health Insurance Plans, a Washington-based insurer trade group, testified at a Senate hearing in early February that problems with efforts to change or replace the Affordable Care Act, or delays in efforts to set rules for 2018, could lead to loss of access to individual coverage in many U.S. markets.

Severe disruption in the individual market could disrupt the small-group market.

Insurers and brokers may need to get creative to come up with quick solutions for employers in coverage deserts.

Smedsrud, for example, says he expects to see explosive growth in sales of fixed indemnity plans that can pay more than $1 million per year in benefits.

3. Delays

If Congress makes major changes in federal health laws, voluntary products issuers might need to replace their old products with updated products. But state insurance departments might be too busy dealing with upheaval at major medical insurers to have an easy time processing filings for new supplemental health products. 

4. Employer confusion

When the Affordable Care Act was coming to life, employers were too busy worrying about the ACA to think much about supplemental benefits.

Now, securities analysts are wondering whether a shift away from the ACA could lead to another period of employer angst and inability to focus on products other than major medical.

Executives at Unum and Columbus, Georgia-based Aflac Inc. took questions about that topic during recent conference calls with analysts.

At Aflac, for example, Teresa White, the president of Aflac's U.S. unit, said last week that she's still talking to agents and brokers to find out what they're hearing about employers' reaction to ACA change uncertainty.

5. Risk management worries

Writing a profitable supplemental health product is harder than it looks.

In 2015, for example, when the major medical looked stable, Michael Weilant of Milliman noted in a presentation at a Society of Actuaries event in Austin, Texas, that issuers were struggling with low participation rates by employers' employees, and pressure from employers to offer products without asking about the workers' health.

Another speaker, from a carrier, complained about declining enroller access to employees.

Major medical turmoil could make any existing voluntary market risk-management problems worse.

6. Killer competition

Although Affordable Care Act change paralysis could keep some insurers from competing effectively in the market later this year and in 2018, disruption in the major medical market could push some major medical carriers into efforts to make up for lost major medical business by increasing voluntary products sales.

7. Crazy growth

Sales growth that's far stronger than expected can strain an insurer's capital reserves and lead to claim projection problems.

This risk could especially acute if a botched Affordable Care Act change effort pushes large numbers of employers to use supplemental health products as major medical coverage alternatives.

15.1% of PCPs Want the ACA Repealed In Its Entirety


The New England Journal of Medicine recently published a survey on physicians' perspectives on ACA repeal. Here are some key findings from the report:

15.1% of PCPs said they wanted the ACA to be repealed in its entirety.
Among physicians who voted for Trump, 37.9% wanted the ACA repealed.
95.1% say the regulations on preexisting conditions was "very important."
3 in 4 physicians support giving tax subsidies to individuals.
Half (49.5%) favor the tax penalty for individuals who don't buy insurance.
73.8% of PCPs favor making changes to the ACA.

Source: NEJM, February 2017