Power split in the Senate, and
regulatory process constraints, may shape the possibilities
Nov 09, 2016 | By Allison Bell
Donald Trump gave an election victory speech early Wednesday morning.
Trump's victory could mean big, immediate changes in how the U.S.
federal government approaches health policy, along with smaller, slower changes
in federal health laws, regulations and programs.
Trump has said, repeatedly, that he wants to repeal and replace the
Affordable Care Act.
Trump has talked about replacing the ACA with a combination of an expanded health savings account
program, interstate sales of health insurance, and a subsidized risk pool
program for people with health problems.
During the victory speech, he thanked Dr. Ben Carson, a surgeon who was a
strong advocate of making expanded health savings accounts the core of an ACA
alternative.
Trump has also talked during the recent presidential debates and at
campaign events about wanting to replace the current, federally
driven Medicaid funding system that would rely more on block grants,
or giving states fixed amounts of cash and letting them decide how to
spend the cash.
At other points, Trump has said that he wants to preserve Medicare benefits
for the elderly and increase spending on Alzheimer's research.
Drafters of several Republican ACA replacement proposals, such as the Sessions-Cassidy proposal,
have talked about keeping some of the more popular ACA consumer protection
provisions, such as the mandate requiring insurers to offer parents a chance to
keep young adults on their health coverage up to age 26, and at least some kind
of one-time access to major medical coverage on a guaranteed-issue basis.
Some of the proposals would give states the option of keeping their ACA
exchange.
All of the Republican ACA replacement proposals have called for
eliminvating the ACA provision that requires many individuals to own health
coverage, and the ACA provision that requires many employers to offer
health coverage.
The official Republican Party platform calls for providing more support for
helping people who need long-term care stay in their own homes.
Obstacles, and
opportunities
One big obstacle a Trump administration would face is, Republicans have
only a slim lead in the Senate.
At press time, Democrats appeared to be on track to have at least 47 firm
Democratic and independent votes in the Senate.
The Trump administration will only need a majority vote to get certain
kinds of budget measures through the Senate, but they will need 60 votes to get
other kinds of legislation to the Senate floor. That means getting major
ACA change or repeal bills to the Senate floor may be about as difficult
during the next two years as it's been for the past eight.
Another challenge: Federal regulatory process rules put tight limits
on what a president can do to eliminate a predecessor's regulations.
Stuart Shapiro, a regulation law expert at Rutgers University, described
the regulatory process constraints that any new president faces in an article for The Hill
published back in December.
A new administration can avoid implementing any relatively new
regulations. That means, for example, that the Trump administration might be
able to avoid implementing the recently released draft ACA parameters for 2018.
But a new administration has to get Congress to pass legislation or go
through the full rulemaking process to revoke or rewrite regulations and kill
established regulations, Shapiro says.
Even when an administration goes through the rulemaking process to
eliminate an established regulation, the federal courts may reverse the
administration's actions, Shapiro adds.
One possible source of strength that Trump may have in his favor is that he
seems to have had a good relationship with Charles Schumer, the New York
senator who is on track to be the next Senate minority leader. He
contributed to Schumer's campaigns several times, and, in 2008, he hosted
a major fundraiser for a Democratic Senate fundraising committee Schumer ran.
Schumer told an audience in April that he thought Trump was a
relatively moderate Republican who could help break the gridlock in
Congress, according to Maxwell Tani of Business Insider.
Another opening for Trump is that the strength of his victory could help
uncork the frustration of Senate Democrats who have supported the ACA for the
sake of Democratic unity but have had their own concerns about how ACA rules
and programs have worked.
http://www.lifehealthpro.com/2016/11/09/what-a-trump-presidency-means-for-the-aca?eNL=58223391160ba06842f23c35&utm_source=LHPro_Daily&utm_medium=EMC-Email_editorial&utm_campaign=11092016&page_all=1
No comments:
Post a Comment