By James
Gutman - November 10, 2015
Medicare Advantage plan sponsors and
pharmaceutical producers always have had somewhat of an uneasy relationship
since what is revenue to the drugmakers is cost to the insurers, at least in
the short run. But the two sectors were able to put aside their differences
when the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was adopted since each saw the potential for
gaining millions of new customers because of the law. Any thoughts that this
alliance could endure, however, clearly seem to have disappeared in recent
months as drug prices have soared and insurers have gotten bitter that they are
subject to strict rate-hike and medical loss ratio curbs while the
pharmaceutical producers aren’t.
Consider, as evidence that the gloves
are coming off, the campaigns that some of the insurer trade groups have
launched in recent months on behalf of their members, and some of the responses
by pharmaceutical groups. America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), for
instance, launched in September its “Drug of the Week” — which is actually more
like a “Drug of the Month” — press release in which it has featured high prices
occurring as new pharmaceuticals come into the market and prices on some
existing drugs soar. The costly new PCSK9 inhibitors for cholesterol control
got the first AHIP raspberry, while 13-year-old arthritis drug Humira got
singled out for the second round on the basis of 82% price hikes since 2007 and
new and potentially enriching orphan-drug status it won for treating other
diseases.
Today AHIP sent out excerpts of
articles that show both some Republican and Democratic presidential candidates
have started bashing the pharmaceutical industry for raising prices so sharply
in recent months. Even some large pharmacy benefit managers are taking up the
fight, as shown in AHIP’s Medicare conference last month when Steve Miller,
M.D., senior vice president and chief medical officer at Express Scripts
Holding Co., said in a drug-price session that “brand drug inflation is totally
out of control.”
Pharmaceutical producers, whose chief
trade association interestingly hired away AHIP chief spokesperson Rob
Zirkelbach about two years ago to perform the same role for it, were having
none of this. Lori Reilly, executive vice president for policy and research at
that trade group, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, told
the AHIP conference session that an “unprecedented level” of rebates and
discounts from drug producers substantially limits the effective size of price
hikes for both the insurers and their members. Moreover, she noted, the insurer
comments don’t take into account the host of current drugs that are losing
patent protection in the next five years and thus will be going generic and
lowering costs. “Patents come and go, but generics are forever,” Reilly said.
Where is this burgeoning dispute
heading? Is it a sign of what’s coming that some portions of the pharmaceutical
industry are going right back after insurers, as Biotechnology Industry
Organization Chair Ron Cohen, M.D., did at AHIP's conference when he suggested
part of the problem is the “unbelievable variation” in how plans treat
different drugs via utilization management? Is there some ACA-like common
ground the two sides can find before the courts and Congress wind up having to
declare winners and losers? Or would that be akin to closing the barn door
after the horse — or elephant or donkey — already is out?
No comments:
Post a Comment